Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Math Junkie who wrote (23735)	8/16/2006 10:37:48 AM
From: Honey_Bee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Math Junkie referred me back to post #22207 where he made a comment about Bob Brinker's answer to a caller's question about QQQQs he was holding from 5-6 years ago. Pardon me, Math, but this is probably the most RIDICULOUS answer I have ever read from you about Bob Brinker. You cannot be serious--or can you? To this question: "What did you think about Brinker dishonest handling the caller's question about what to do about QQQQs he'd held for 5 years?" Math junkie answered: "According to what people have written about his answer, he referred to taking some QQQQ out of the model portfolios earlier in the year. My guess is that he expected people who were still holding some from 2000 - 2001 to understand that they should take a similar percentage off the table at that time. It would have been better if he had explicitly stated that when he made the recommendation, and the honest thing to do in answering the caller's question would have been to state that he meant that to apply not only to the model portfolios, but also the shares he recommended buying in 2000-2001." . Math junkie, is there no limit to your spinning? Are you now willing to "guess" what Bob Brinker "expected people" to do? Truly amazing!!!! . .