SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (144373)8/16/2006 11:49:29 AM
From: pheilman_  Respond to of 152472
 
Nokia is merely confused about the meaning of usufruct.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (144373)8/16/2006 12:24:40 PM
From: rkral  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 152472
 
re: "They hold their meetings and come up with weirdo standards - GSM GPRS EDGE W-CDMA, and QCOM is supposed to know what's going on and is supposed to be bound by agreements in which they didn't participate."

It's quite easy to see that Qualcomm -- by way of 3GPP members from Qualcomm Europe -- had participant(s) at the first and the most recent meetings of the 3GPP GERAN project group. I'd be suprised if a Qualcomm representative wasn't at every one of the other 28 meetings.
3gpp.org

Of course, that says nothing about their role or their technical judgment relative to Qualcomm IPR.

P.S. Inter alia, EDGE came into being via the GERAN project



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (144373)8/16/2006 12:45:55 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Court should be fun!--Maurice, it's very likely these issues will never get to court because of the consequences for the loser(s). On the other hand, one should not second guess a court, especially the courts at the federal level, whose judges are, more often than not, simply political hacks without the ability or the incentive to rule impartially. Who knows? A judge might be inclined to make a ruling favoring whatever policies are enjoyed by the likes of Texas Instruments. This also adds to uncertainties for both sides, making an out of court settlement the most likely prospect.

I'd look for a settlement late in October or early November, especially if the ITC rules on the QCOM-BRCM matter in favor of QCOM. This is in reference to the 50-day extension announced by the FTC judge, bringing the decision day to October 10.

Art



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (144373)8/18/2006 12:09:30 PM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
For a number of reasons set forth in the Moderated thread, I have concluded that Q's case for infringement re: GSM, GPRS, and EDGE is looking quite promising. Not one hundred percent favorable, mind you, but very, very good. Good enough so that I would put a decently sized bet on a win if I were a gambling man.