Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: peterk who wrote (54612)	8/17/2006 12:06:35 AM
From: BDAZZ	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 196502

>>Why not believe the Qualcomm spokesperson who came to the same conclusion as voop in an earlier posting?<< Again Voop's quote did not come from QCOM spin as accused here, but from Nokia's own PR department's press release on the Deleware action: >>ESPOO, Finland, August 9 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Nokia (NYSE: NOK ) announced today that it has filed a complaint against Qualcomm with the Delaware Court of Chancery in the U.S. Nokia is asking the Court to order Qualcomm to abide by its written contractual obligations to international standards setting organizations to license intellectual property essential to GSM and UMTS technology standards on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms.<< money.aol.com

To: peterk who wrote (54612)	8/17/2006 10:18:45 AM
From: slacker711	Respond to of 196502

I see, because Nokia denies Qualcomm's allegations we should believe them? Why not believe the Qualcomm spokesperson who came to the same conclusion as voop in an earlier posting? I'm not saying in any way shape or form that Nokia is not guilty of violating Q's IPR.....what I am saying (and will continue to say), is that there is simply no way in hell that Nokia has admitted in court or in a press release that are in infringement of Q's GSM IPR. It would violate every rule of common sense to believe that they would ever make that addmission. The filing backs that up. They deny absolutely every aspect of Q's charges. We'll have to wait and see what the filing from Delaware says, but I would be stunned if it says anything different. Slacker