Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 10K a day who wrote (13560)	8/16/2006 11:54:15 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

That site is old news by now. Do you see any thermite or thermate in that photo? TP

To: 10K a day who wrote (13560)	8/17/2006 12:08:03 AM
From: David Howe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

LOL! Here's a great quote from the pathetic article: <<< Brigham Young University physicist Professor Steven Jones told peers at a Utah meeting that, "while almost no fire, even one ignited by jet fuel, can cause structural steel to fail >>> Some professor. The construction industry coats structural steel with a product called "Fire Proofing". It's sprayed and covers the steel. Its very purpose is to prevent structural failure of the steel when exposed to fire. Thus the name "fire proofing". Almost any fire can weaken steel if it burns long enough. Obviously 1000's of gallons of jet fuel would be more than enough to cause the failure of the steel. Is this really still being debated? What sort of 'professor' would say 'almost no fire ... can cause structural steel to fail'???