Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RMF who wrote (13692)	8/18/2006 1:42:45 AM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

Is the current state of affairs in Iraq a screw-up or was it intentionally planned to devolve into the current state? When Bush says things are going well in Iraq, he isn't referring to what you or I would call going well. But for the bushistas, it's on track for what they planned. If the bushistas had no qualms about killing thousands of American civilians on 9/11 do you think they would have qualms about the deaths of US military personnel or Iraqi civilians? Remember, those closely involved in the events that have been called screw-ups have all been promoted. The media here is more tightly controlled than that of the USSR in their heyday. No screw-up there. Do you recall that during Katrina a sheriff caught a team of federal agents cutting communication lines down there? The sheriff gave a press conference about it and I've never seen somebody so irate in a press conference before. He posted deputies after repairing the damage to make sure it wouldn't happen again. Given the obvious intention to undermine order in that act by federal agents, was the "screwed up" federal response to Katrina really a screw-up? Or was it intentional? Think about what the bushistas are trying to bring about. From their point of view they're being quite effective.

To: RMF who wrote (13692)	8/18/2006 2:07:40 AM
From: Orcastraiter	Respond to of 20039

Just like the terrorists, they only have to be successful once.

To: RMF who wrote (13692)	8/22/2006 7:19:53 PM
From: Cyprian	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Doug, after seeing how the neo-cons have screwed up everything else they've had a hand in I would seriously doubt they could have planned 9/11 and pulled it off. If they did then it must have been their ONLY successful operation. Obviously it wasn't very successful now was it? For it to be successful, it would have to be believable. And fewer and fewer people by the day believe them, so ultimately this will backfire on them and will be judged to be a colossal blunder. If 9/11 was the blunder that finally exposed the nakedness of the great harlot, it could hardly be considered a success.