Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (300561)	8/18/2006 5:05:00 AM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1579841

"Step 10: After nuking Tel Aviv, play on the world's fears of a nuclear war. They'll prevent Israel from responding with their own nukes." We will ignore the detail of how they would deliver said nuke on Tel Aviv. How would world opinion form quick enough to keep Israel from responding? It takes, at most, a couple of minutes to launch an IRBM or scramble planes or what ever is Israel's choice of delivery system. All 200+ nukes could be expended well before the rest of the world is even aware that Tel Aviv is gone. I don't think your step (10)is plausible.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (300561)	8/18/2006 9:46:06 AM
From: bentway	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1579841

"After nuking Tel Aviv, play on the world's fears of a nuclear war. They'll prevent Israel from responding with their own nukes." Do you really believe this would be the result? Israel would GLASS OVER any country that had nuked it, and ALL the arabs know this. They'd probably GLASS OVER ALL the Arab countries and Iran, just for good measure. Your scenario skipped all the steps, besides being ludicrous fearmongering (why is it you right wingnuts are so into the fear?). The arabs have NO nukes. The KNOW Isreal has nukes on missiles, aircraft and submarines. They are NOT going to strike Israel.