SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Miracle of Islamic Science -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (163)8/19/2006 6:41:39 AM
From: E. T.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 273
 
It's hardly fair for you to ban me from the President Bush thread for citing an article recently published in South America. The article was to show what other people in other lands not far from here think of the President. I believe my posting fit into the realm of your criteria for the forum which you say is "vigorous discussion is always welcome here, but uncivil rudeness and/or vulgarity are not acceptable." I was neither uncivil or rude. For those interested, I've pasted the article in question below. When did the President Bush forum become a place for lemmings only?

ET

George Walker Bush will likely pass into history as the worst president of the United States. He might not even finish his second term. The reason: deliberate wrongs like the "telephone eavesdropping" of society, govenment decision-making in the hands of lobbyists tied to petroleum interests and weapons dealers that surround the president, and schemes of political extortion like that of Jack Abramoff , a dealer of influence to the highest bidder.

George W. Bush: Owes alot to dad.

-------------------------------------- The youth of George W. Bush (whose grades never exceeded the "C" level) was a tempestuous one. He took strongly to bourbon and cocaine, "was uncontrollable," and had several "weekends of perdition" in Mexico. For Michael C. Dannenhauer, former chief of staff during the presidency of Bush Sr., "the worst wasn't the cocaine or the women," but the drinking. George W. admits to having has a great deal to drink in his youth, but "with regard to his cocaine use, he has systematically evaded the subject," though as asserted by Toby Rogers and Nick Mamatas, he began using cocaine "a bit prior to 1977."

The news first became known in the Houston Public News, which interviewed Dannenhaur on April 21, 1998, and later in The Village Voice, High Times, and The Times (of London). Bush was arrested in 1972 for cocaine possession, and, as punishment, performed community service. His father, then director of the CIA (during Gerald Ford's Administration), erased any trace of the incident from his son's criminal file. Years later, Dannenhauer (an employee of Bush Sr. since 1985) gave three versions of the Bush story: 1) he said the interview with the Houston Public News never happened; 2) he said the interview was conducted years earlier; and 3) he stammered something incoherent, like some regretful informant.

The case of Bush Jr. reminds me of the son of Donna Rinak, U.S. ambassador to Bolivia (1998). Her son enjoyed the criminal "Carrion Game," in which privileged sons attending Calvert, the exclusive La Paz school, would kill someone ... for fun. This brat - who was summoned to appear in court - left Bolivia in a hurry with the help of his mother. With good reason, the journalist Robert Parry (who was afterwards forced to retire from Newsweek) notes that, "the crimes of these privileged sons disappear forever without them having to face the law."

Bush Jr. was also a failed businessman. [Italian journalist] Francesco Piccioni asserts that in the late 70s he created Arbusto Energy with the help of James Bah and the capital of Khaled Bin Mafouz and Salem bin Laden, a relative of Osama bin Laden.

A GROUP CLOSE TO POWER

George H. W. Bush:
The ultimate revenge?

------------------------------------ The Bush clan is boastful. Its members are "conservative Republicans with militaristic leanings" and belong to the aristocratic tradition of the WASPs (White Anglo-Saxon Protestants). Bush Sr. controls his son's political decisions through this clan, which is composed of Richard Cheney, Karl Rove, and strategic groups representing military, petroleum, financial and intelligence interests.

Those groups became allied when Bush Sr. lost his re-election bid to Bill Clinton in 1995, and he decided (with a CIA-type operative) to "make" his son George W., the president. That explains the electoral fraud revealed by Michael Moore and his documentary, "Fahrenheit 9/11."

The group that "handles" President Bush belongs to organizations like the Bilderberg Group , Skull & Bones and the Illuminati , and has as its guiding principle Social Darwinism , that theory of superior and inferior races; the latter, they would argue, should be semi-enslaved by means of consumption and diversion ("bread and circuses"). One member of the clan is Paul Wolfowitz, director of the World Bank.

ERROR 1: MEDIOCRE INTELLIGENCE AND ESPIONAGE AGAINST SOCIETY

-------------------------------------------------------- The U.S. "intelligence community" (NSA, CIA, FBI) is ineffective. It couldn't decipher (until the 20th of September, 2001) the message "tomorrow is zero hour" intercepted on the 9th of September. And in Laurel, Maryland, the very home of that "community," many of the Twin Tower terrorists left tracks behind, as was revealed in the Washington Post on 6/2/2002. That intelligence community also believed "Curveball," the discredited ex-employee of the Iraqi chemical industry who said that Iraq had nuclear weapons, a claim Bush used in his public speeches. [Most importantly, his 2003 State of the Union ].

Now, Saul Landau notes , Rove and the clan are distracting American society by showing how "patriotic" Bush's government is. The "protection of national security" is the new pretext being used to justify the massive monitoring of telephone calls, so-called "vital intelligence." American citizens finance, with their tax dollars, military invasions in Afghanistan and Iraq - and the espionage being practiced on their own telephone calls. Already in May of 2006, the telephone companies AT&T, Verizon, and Pacific Bell were accused of voluntarily handing over to the National Security Agency (NSA) lists of international phone calls made from within the U.S., and John Negroponte (head of the NSA) was authorized to decide what corporations remain, for national security reasons, subject to external controls, required to provide lists of daily transactions and accounts.

ERROR 2: GOVERNMENT AND ECONOMY IN DECLINE

And so the decline began. The failures of the intelligence community followed those by the Congress, which remains embroiled in the Abramoff controversy; and the Justice Department, which under John Ashcroft legalized torture in the fight against the global terrorism. And what is there to say of the economy? James Petras is pessimistic in his evaluation of the "State of the Empire, 2006 ," he anticipates a raft of speculative bankruptcies like the Savings and Loan debacle, the dot-com bust, or Enron, and the agitation of an uninformed electorate with little capacity to defend its rights. To that, we can add Bush Jr.'s low opinion numbers (less than 30% according to pollsters).

Jack Abramoff: Greasing the wheels.

------------------------------------------ In turn, economist David Harvey , author of the book "The New Imperialism," cited by Veronica Gago, notes that only two of the ten leading car companies (Ford and General Motors) are from the U.S., and those have growing financial difficulties. The U.S. still dominates "agri-business" through subsidies, but borrows almost $2 million per day from the central banks of Eastern and Asian countries, yet it has a decisive vote in the IMF, World Trade Organization and Wall Street, and is the chief regulator of the capital markets though it itself lives in a dangerous "speculative bubble." And increases in "external military costs" is being offset by reductions in domestic spending. According to American Democratic lawmakers, this will increase prices on medicine for the elderly and will further limit the financial aid available for college students.

But none of this matters when it is power that is being traded. Dennis Sett, former U.S. ambassador to Peru [and dean of the University of Florida International Center], wrote in the May edition of the Peruvian magazine Caretas, that, "The lobbies have replicated themselves inside the Bush Administration. Every decision, every regulation, every action of the government is for sale. He who pays more, wins. And Bush never ceases to lie to Congress and the taxpayer."

ERROR 3: THE CASE OF JACK ABRAMOFF

The Jack Abramoff scandal is a typical case of dealing influence to the highest bidder. The lobbyist, who donated $1.25 million to the Republican Party and bribed more than ten senators in exchange for lucrative contracts for his "clients," is a benefactor of the Jewish community. According to Orlando Lizama, Abramoff owns two luxury restaurants near the Capitol where well-known Republicans go wearing hats (so as not to be noticed), and a $147 million fleet of casino-boats purchased with a loan from Konstantinos Baulis, another dealer in the political game who was found dead shortly afterward.

The procedure followed by Jack, according to himself, is to have the right people elected through economic trickery, and to place corporate financial officers in favorable position to influence legislation and judicial decisions.

Tom Delay: Casualty of Corruption?

------------------------------------------ Those are several others implicated along with Abramoff (a "good friend" of Bush). Tom Delay, chief Republican legislator, Bush fundraiser and an influential Washington politician resigned, accused by a Texas jury of criminal conspiracy, of violating election financing rules and of channeling millions of dollars in corporate donations to Republican candidates in the 2003 Texas legislative election. Denis Hastert had to return $69,000 in donated funds. Even Bush had to return $6,000, given by Jack for his electoral campaign. Abramoff has pled guilty to conspiracy and money laundering.

Democracy in the United States is eroding. It is being driven by an oligarchy which uses Bush Jr. as a mere communicator/messenger boy. That much is clear as water. And will continue.

(*) Edgar Ramos Andrade. Spokesman for UNLP-Argentina. Investigator and social activist. Author of the books "Agony and Social Rebellion [aGONIa y Rebelión Social]" and "Inclusion and the Dignity of Native Peoples [Inclusión y Dignidad Indígena]." Tel (00591) 772-20736 email: sdiprensa@latinmail.com

watchingamerica.com



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (163)8/21/2006 10:12:55 AM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 273
 



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (163)8/22/2006 9:32:46 AM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 273
 
Thuggery & Trickery: How Islamic Terrorists Manipulate the Media
Joel Mowbray
Mon Aug 21, 8:30 AM ET

With Fox News reporter Steve Centanni and cameraman Olaf Wiig still being held hostage by Palestinian terrorists, the Western media has received a potent reminder that broadcasting certain truths from inside Arab territory can result in devastating consequences.

While it is not clear the kidnappers' motivation--they have yet to state any demands--this is just the latest in a string of abductions, which is in and of itself only part of the arsenal of heavy-handed media intimidation present in the region.

Thuggery helps explain the obscenely low volume of negative press coverage of the Palestinian Authority, Fatah, Hamas, Hezbollah, and others. But it doesn't account for all, or even most, of the persistently slanted coverage.

As any veteran of Middle East media coverage knows, many Arab stringers and free-lancers--hired on the cheap by Western outlets, ostensibly because of their superior knowledge for local leaders and events--see it as their duty to demonize Israel, while exalting fellow Arabs or Muslims.

But while the widespread use of Arab locals in covering the Middle East and the frightening level of threatened and real violence are both deeply troubling, more concerning is that the Palestinian propaganda machine has enjoyed tremendous success over the years hoodwinking supposedly sophisticated Western journalists. And Hezbollah has done just that over the past month.

In short, almost nothing that is purported to happen in the Arab world can automatically be taken at face value. Not even if it's captured in a photo.

Problems with "fixers"

When Reuters was forced to sever ties with freelance photographer Adnan Hajj and remove over 900 of his photos from its database earlier this month, long-whispered questions about the reliability of Arab stringers and freelancers came to the forefront.

Nowhere is the use of Arab "fixers" (as they are known) more common than in the Palestinian territories. And yet despite the extensive reliance on locals who presumably enjoy greater familiarity with the terrain and key players, negative press coverage of the Palestinian Authority or various Islamic terrorist organizations operating in the territories has long been scant.

This void in coverage is not because such evidence does not exist. The Palestinian Media Watch(http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/realclearpolitics/cm_rcp/storytext/thuggery_trickery_how_islamic/20... a nonprofit that operates on a tight budget, has easily reported more on PA incitement and indoctrination, for example, than all Western media outlets combined.

The revelation that Hajj had digitally manipulated his photos left at least one prominent Arab journalist was unsurprised. "Sadly, things like this happen a lot, especially when your local fixers are openly affiliated and have a clear agenda," explains Jerusalem Post reporter Khaled Abu Toameh. He adds that some of the Arab stringers and freelancers contracted by Western media outlets are "people who see themselves as foot soldiers for the cause."

Violence against Arab journalists

Toameh is careful not to paint with too broad a brush, and he stresses that there are Arab journalists who do their best to get the story out. But the record is well-established that reporting certain truths in the Palestinian territories can result in intimidation or sometimes severe violence.

Whereas most of the Western journalists kidnapped before Centanni and Wiig have been released within hours, threatened and actual violence against their Arab counterparts has been far more brutal.

After being arrested and detained for six days because he didn't give Yasser Arafat the desired coverage in the run-up to the 1996 election, Maher al-Alami, editor of Al Quds, the largest Palestinian newspaper in Jerusalem, said that "the Palestinian media follow his (Arafat's) instructions out of fear."

When an Associated Press camerman filmed Palestinians in Nablus rejoicing the 9/11 attacks, he "was summoned to a Palestinian Authority security office and told that the material must not be aired," according to the AP's own account. Threats from Islamic terrorists on Arafat's payroll quickly followed. One PA cabinet officer even stated that the PA could not "guarantee the life" of the cameraman if the footage was released.

The Associated Press never officially released the footage.

How the "stage" is set

To get an idea the lengths to which Palestinians have gone to manufacture sympathy for them and outrage against the Jewish state, consider a production from April 28, 2002. During a funeral procession, the stretcher carrying the "victim" was dropped. Oops. No problem, though, as the "victim" sprung up quickly and was able to shake it off.

The only reason the public learned of the funny, phony funeral was because it was captured on video by an Israeli drone. Given that almost everything done by the Palestinian propaganda machine is for the media, why did it only come out after the Israeli government released its grainy footage? Good thing for the Palestinians, though, that productions for Western consumption typically have gone much smoother.

Examples abound of Western reporters being duped or threatened. In April 2002, Israel Defense Forces raided the Jenin refugee camp, a known terrorist breeding ground and safe haven. Palestinians immediately accused the Jewish state of systematically committing war crimes, and the buzzword soon tossed about by the Western press was "massacre."

That no massacre actually occurred--not even the United Nations, the Palestinians' best friend, found any evidence to suggest one had--received only a fraction of the earlier, largely uncritical reporting. Ditto for the incident this June where many family members died on a beach in northern Gaza. Originally covered as an Israeli shelling of innocent Palestinians, it turned out that Israel almost certainly played no role in the tragedy. The media mea culpa, though, was essentially mute.

In a widely circulated photo taken last month and distributed by Agence France Press, two older, hijab-clad Lebanese women are wailing in front of caskets. Dozens of caskets, actually. The caskets were lined up against a wall, and numbers were spray-painted on the wall. Somehow, the women had wedged themselves into the narrow space between the coffins and the wall, and the numbers conveniently appeared directly behind them--guaranteed to be in any photo. (Click here to view.)

The problems with the photo are obvious. Why would the women force their way into a crevice, when they could more easily face both the caskets and the wall? Quite simply, that shot wouldn't capture both the mourning faces and the numbers signifying the enormity of the tragedy. And on the topic of the numbers, the ones spray-painted on the wall were the kind used in the west, not in South Lebanon, thus erasing any doubt about the photo-op's intended audience.

This photo, though, was not taken by an Arab freelancer or some hack Westerner. It was shot by award-winning photographer Marco Di Lauro, who won praise for his work with Marines in Iraq. The benign--and probably correct--interpretation is that he just wasn't suspicious enough.

Yet given that thugs from Hezbollah, Hamas, and Arafat's Fatah control almost everything in the most "newsworthy" areas of the Arab world, any scene or event encountered by Western media outlets must be viewed with supreme skepticism.

But it's not as if this is news to the Western media. They know it. Yet pretend as if they don't. That's the real travesty.