SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: StockDung who wrote (94964)8/19/2006 12:03:30 PM
From: rrufff  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
Some simple questions for those of us trying to follow this debate in non-CAPS mode.

1. Why is it you think that Simpson did NOT buy the entire float? Are you questioning his buy? Are you questioning the amount of the float? Both questions seem susceptible to easy answers.

2. You have posted, in essence, that you believe the SEC is not covering up anything. Have you read or listened to Mark Aguirre's testimony?

thanks in advance



To: StockDung who wrote (94964)8/19/2006 5:37:51 PM
From: Buckey  Respond to of 122087
 
well - I had 80% oif the total outstanding for a portion of the second day GLKCE traded after the reverse split. I woned 1 Million shares and actually held 500,000 for quite a while after that so I actually beleive it to be quite possible Simpson owned what he said he did.

This one was a broker mistake where shares did not get reversed out of accounts. So the share price went up to reflect the revse split but peiople sold their pre reverse split shares after the reverse. Many many million were mistakenly sold short.

I am not sure what ever happened with the recent history of GLKCE now GLLC but it was fun - I made $40,000 us on a $1200 buy

I DO NOT THINK SIMPSON EVER BOUGHT 100% OF THE FLOAT. ITS THE LIE YOU ARE SPREADING AND SOONER OR LATER YOU WILL BE PROVEN WRONG AND GLOBAL LINKS WILL BE YOUR DOWN FALL