SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: AK2004 who wrote (300779)8/20/2006 7:32:32 AM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580249
 
"you do realize that buildings are not disassembled in an individual bricks."

Yes. Your point?

"And speaking of resolution you do realize that the yellow line on the street is clearly visible"

I don't see that. On my monitor, minimum feature size seems to be on the order of a meter or so.

"you do realize that you can estimate the direction of the light from the clearly seen shadows of the buildings"

Absolutely. If you note, the lighting on the top is more oblique, while the lighting on the bottom is more vertical. It would be much more difficult to resolve rubble in the bottom photo.



To: AK2004 who wrote (300779)8/20/2006 10:11:44 AM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580249
 
more Photoshop edits....



To: AK2004 who wrote (300779)8/20/2006 6:41:32 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580249
 
re: But the apparent lack of rubble isn't proof.

why not? Either way how would you explain clearly lower resolution of rubble and fairly high resolution of standing buildings :-))


I see. Now you're saying the Israeli bombings did not occur......that all the bombed buildings shown on the tube aren't real. Have you been talking to telaviv miri?

What's your explanation for the deception......mass hallucination?