Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Natural Resource Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hubris33 who wrote (43211)	8/22/2006 7:13:14 PM
From: austrieconomist	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108672

AQI. Maybe my peception is colored, as a one time AQI shareholder, but the judge saw it just as I did. AQI signed a confidentiality agreement with the major just as did everyone else who wanted to look at the properties and possibly submit a bid. AQI won the bid which entitled them to not only the properties but all the information. In the meantime IMR rushed out and staked the Natividad property like mad while having no reason to be there, were it not for the prospectivity of the information covered by the confidentiality agreement. Maybe AQI management is entrenched but I applaud them for it.

To: hubris33 who wrote (43211)	8/25/2006 11:16:05 AM
From: Postman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108672

AQI will have no problem raising the money- I think they already have a bunch from warrants being exercised- plus their group has already raised about $30 million in the past few years- Navidad may end up being the biggest silver deposit in the world- believe me it is worth the effort. IMR took their data and the lawyers showed that AQI would have found it with that data in their control so IMR had to give it over to AQI. -If AQI has too many problems they will just sell it to someone with the right political connections- it is a great prize for a junior to won.