Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (198815)	8/23/2006 3:19:19 PM
From: Sam	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

"Congressman Fitzpatrick says no to both extremes: No to President Bush's 'stay-the-course' strategy, ... and no to Patrick Murphy's 'cut-and-run' approach," said a Fitzpatrick campaign flier described in the Washington Times. lol, so what's his solution? Or is his solution to "Just say NO" to everything proposed? Probably is, because any proposal will seem either very bad or horrendous or intolerable. That is the corner that Bush and his Backers have painted the US into. "The choice in this election is not between 'stay the course' and 'cut and run.' It's between 'win by adapting' and 'cut and run,'" Republican National Committee chairman Ken Mehlman said last week. I have to say Mehlman is a rhetorical genius. I wonder if anyone will ask him, what does "win by adapting" mean? In particular, what does 'win' in this context? And in one much-publicized case, a former conservative-lawmaker-turned-talk-show-host spent time with his guests discussing whether Bush's "mental weakness" hurt the United States abroad, while the television screen asked the question "Is Bush An Idiot?" The answer to that question is pretty obvious. Anyone know who this so-called "conservative" lawmaker is?