Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (27060)	8/23/2006 4:52:40 PM
From: Dale Baker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541299

It's terrible how this country is loosing its sense of grammar. Just keeps getting more and more worse all the time. ;<) (I hear and read that kind of stuff all the time).

To: Lane3 who wrote (27060)	8/23/2006 5:21:12 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541299

I'm not absolutely sure either but I do believe the average person is more educated. Maybe less educated in certain specific ways. Perhaps our ability or willingness to proper grammar has gone down, likely our geographical knowledge has on the average decreased, but we know more about other subjects. I've read people argue that we were less educated by comparing people who have achieved a certain level of formal educational achievement, but the average level of formal educational achievement is now higher. Its possible that the average person with a high school education buy no college, was more educated in the past than the average person in the same situation now, but fewer people have only that level of formal education or less. Another type of argument that is used is presenting an old test to relatively intelligent educated people, and letting them see how they struggle with it. But the people taking the old test would have just studied that exact subject, and many of those exact questions. While modern adults might not have studied the subject in years, and even when they did study it you had different parts of the subject emphasized by the instructor. A third argument is similar to the 2nd but focuses on a particular subject that had more emphasis in the past, for example people might be asked geography questions and told that in the past many people could answer these questions. A 4th argument is like yours, anecdotal. You gave an example of one person. That one person might not be representative, or the one statement might not be representative of most of what that person says or people in the past might have had similar problems. Also see en.wikipedia.org