Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito who wrote (56258)	8/23/2006 5:58:59 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 213185

this settlement reminds me of when GOOG paid YHOO a few hundred million (in GOOG stock) early on to settle a PPC lawsuit. The yahoo's heralded it as a win for yhoo, and GOOG people saw it as a way for GOOG to move on and eliminate future lawsuits going forward, "the devil you know" kind of thing. Nothing worse than leaving yourself open for future lawsuits. Since apple has SO MUCH money, and this is only a $100mm settlement, its ok.

To: Cogito who wrote (56258)	8/23/2006 8:16:02 PM
From: William F. Wager, Jr.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 213185

"$100 million is chump-change for Apple," said Charlie Wolf, an analyst who follows Apple at Needham & Co. As of July 1, Apple had $8 billion in cash. The deal will also allow Apple to recoup an undisclosed portion of its licensing fee if Creative is successful in licensing its patent to others. As a result, attorneys said, Apple could effectively increase the cost of competing in the digital music player business by helping finance Creative's pursuit of licensing deals with and litigation against other companies. An Apple spokeswoman said the company will record the Creative patent license as an asset that will be amortized over "many years" and that the company doesn't expect any material impact on its finances as a result of the deal. Analysts said the settlement costs for Apple were minor compared to the hefty damages it could have faced if it had lost in court. "When you have a settlement with a large player, that sends a signal that this is a serious claim," said Allonn E. Levy, an intellectual property attorney at Hopkins & Carley in San Jose, CA Microsoft Corp., for instance, is expected to enter the market later this year with a product called Zune, and cell phone makers and wireless carriers are introducing music-oriented handsets. A Creative spokesman said the company is "open to exploring amicable solutions with companies that exploit the patent," though he said it was difficult to tell whether the Microsoft product will fall into that category since Creative hasn't seen the Zune device yet. A Microsoft spokeswoman didn't return a call for comment. The Wall St Journal