Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (199093)	8/24/2006 1:57:43 PM
From: geode00	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I'm neither distorting or failing to read what you wrote. I have reread what you wrote and I still get the same impression that you were quite sure your vision of the future was correct and that you were not entertaining other ideas. =============== Rightwingers always do this. You go and make a claim and then you try and make others do your homework for you. Then when you're proven wrong you disappear into the wind only to pop up again with another unsupported claim. It's pretty funny and it's pretty lame. I'm glad you finally decided to look up the passages you were defending LOL. Now that you've looked up the Constitution you're waffling. No one is saying that he can't spy or that he can't wiretap. People are saying that he can't do it OUTSIDE OF THE LAW AND WITHOUT WARRANTS. It's to prevent him from becoming a dictator. It's to prevent the US of A from becoming a police state. Do you want a dictator? Do you want a police state? If you love liberty and freedom why in the blooming hell do you have a problem with Bush following the blooming law since it's easy for him to do in the first place? OMG. Don't you understand that he could just as easily be bugging political opponents, journalists, activists or Aunt Sallie? The fight against this PROTECTS YOU. Why can't you see that? Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.