SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: slacker711 who wrote (144521)8/25/2006 1:07:39 PM
From: rkral  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
"there was a non-assert period of 3 years in the original 3G license that Nokia signed in '01."

Interesting datapoint, but I think Qualcomm was still obligated to declare Essential IPR to ETSI ... in a "timely fashion" after becoming aware of such IPR.

BTW in which ITC filing did you find that datapoint?



To: slacker711 who wrote (144521)8/25/2006 1:24:57 PM
From: rkral  Respond to of 152472
 
"there was a non-assert period of 3 years in the original 3G license that Nokia signed in '01."

BTW in which ITC filing did you find that datapoint?

Never mind. I found it on page 11 of edisweb.usitc.gov

I wasn't expecting it to be in a Nokia filing.



To: slacker711 who wrote (144521)8/25/2006 6:11:51 PM
From: carranza2  Respond to of 152472
 
I don't know what a non-assert is, but if it is what I think it is, you may have done away with the timeliness issue.

Good find.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News