SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Truth About Islam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longnshort who wrote (39)8/28/2006 12:58:38 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Respond to of 20106
 
LOL!



To: longnshort who wrote (39)8/28/2006 12:58:47 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20106
 
61 killed in Shiite city; Iraq sends reinforcements
POSTED: 12:16 p.m. EDT, August 28, 2006
Adjust font size:

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- The Iraqi Defense Ministry on Monday was sending reinforcements to the Shiite city of Diwaniya to try to stem ongoing clashes that have resulted in the deaths of 23 Iraqi soldiers and 38 militia fighters, an Iraqi army official said.

The fighting, which began late Sunday, has also left 40 people wounded.

The clashes erupted after Iraqi soldiers began searching various parts of Diwaniya, a stronghold of the Mehdi militia, which is loyal to radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.

Diwaniya, about 85 miles (160 kilometers) south of Baghdad, is in Qadisiya Province.

Also Monday, at least 11 people were killed and 63 others wounded when a suicide car bomb detonated at an Iraqi police checkpoint near the Interior Ministry Monday morning, Baghdad emergency police said.

Britain's defense secretary, meanwhile, said that security had improved in southern Iraq, Reuters reported. His Iraqi counterpart predicted that formal control of another province in the region, Dhi Qar province, would be handed back to Iraq soon. (Full story)

Prime minister does not foresee civil war
On Sunday, nearly 50 Iraqis were killed in sectarian violence. But despite the high death toll, Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki said he did not foresee a civil war in Iraq and that violence in his country was abating.

"In Iraq, we'll never be in civil war," al-Maliki told CNN's "Late Edition" on Sunday.

Attacks on American troops around the Iraqi capital Sunday left seven soldiers dead, the U.S. command in Baghdad reported.

Other violence nationwide left more than 130 wounded, local authorities said.

One U.S. soldier was killed by gunfire in eastern Baghdad about 2 p.m. Sunday (6 a.m. ET), while two others were killed by a roadside bomb on the city's west side about half an hour later, according to a U.S. military statement.

The other four soldiers died about 3 p.m., when a roadside bomb struck their vehicle north of Baghdad, the military reported.

U.S. commanders have poured thousands of additional troops into Baghdad in recent weeks in hopes of rolling back sectarian killings that have left thousands of Iraqis dead.

The latest combat deaths bring the number of U.S. troops killed in Iraq to 2,622. Seven American civilian contractors of the military also have died in the conflict.

Despite Health Ministry figures that put the number of Iraqi civilians killed in July at about 3,400 -- more than double the 1,600 killed in January -- the prime minister said violence was decreasing in his country.

Al-Maliki did not dispute figures published in "The Economist" magazine that put unemployment at as high as 40 percent, with double-digit inflation and as much as 20 percent of the population in poverty.

"But this is a new Iraq, and inherited from the previous regime who left unemployment and destruction," said al-Maliki, who won power in December's elections.

Asked when coalition troops might leave, the Iraqi leader was equivocal.

"It could be a year or less, or a few months," he said. "This has to do with the -- with our success of the democratic -- or the political process in Iraq, and to have the security agencies to protect this process."

Sen. Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrat, disagreed with al-Maliki's assessment of the state of affairs in Iraq, saying the country was "on the verge of civil war right now," if not already involved in one.

Levin, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, called for the United States to set a date to begin withdrawing its forces.

"We cannot save the Iraqis from themselves," he told CNN. "They're the ones that have got to decide -- do they want a civil war, or do they want a nation?"

Levin said President Bush should "prod" the Iraqis to take responsibility for their own security.

"The only chance they have of defeating the insurgents is if they come together politically," he said.

But Republican Sen. Richard Lugar of Indiana said withdrawal of coalition forces could make an already bad situation worse.

"The idea, somehow, that civil war means that we leave is a non-starter, because Iraq's physical integrity is important," said Lugar, the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.

"By that I mean, if Iraq deteriorates and Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds begin picking up partners in other countries, then we have a conflagration that dwarfs anything which is occurring presently in the deteriorating problems of Iraq."



To: longnshort who wrote (39)8/28/2006 3:00:45 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20106
 
Where Are The Muslim Mothers For Peace?
Times Online ^ | 8/26/2006 | Ginny Dougary

timesonline.co.uk

Dear New Lot of Terrorists,

I thank you for showing me the light and changing my life. Truly, you have liberated me in ways you could never have foreseen. No longer will my heart feel heavy and my spirit be freighted with dread as I wait for the plane to touch down at JFK or Heathrow. By your actions you have taught me the egregious error of my ways, and from henceforth I will travel unburdened by . . .

This was the letter I was drafting in my head as I experienced one of my most pleasurable flights in 15-odd years of schlepping to and from the United States of the Terrible to interview the rich and famous for The Times. In the bad old days — ie, before 10/8/06 — transatlantic travel had become a gruelling feat of endurance and survival of the pushiest. Negotiating that narrow passageway between the rows of seats, with my child-born hips further widened by a bulging rucksack (an object now robbed of its innocent backpacking past — “does my bomb look big in this?”), a crammed briefcase on one shoulder, and on the other a handbag large enough to hold . . . well, far too much stuff.

All of the above to be stored in the overhead locker, jostling for space with the equally bulky belongings of one’s fellow carthorse travellers. And then the anxiety before the stampede to reload everything on to your weary, jet-lagged body as you face the journey at the other end, when you know you will have to trudge in a nightmarish daze down endless corridors and interminable walkways towards passport control.

Now — Hallelujah! — I have known the joys of flying with only my credit cards, passport and a couple of books in a plastic bag, and I’m never looking back. It is possible, of course, that in years to come it may, once again, be considered almost dubious to travel so light. I may even be prevented from boarding flights to the States with nothing but a see-through bit of polythene carrying all my worldly possessions, the very sight of me clutching such a disposable thing setting off alarm bells in the departure lounge — “Oh! Has there been another threat that we don’t know about?” But having tasted the bliss of the unencumbered, I never want to be a carthorse again.

There was, for me, an additionally odd, circular sense of disbelief about this particular journey. Last summer, a few days after the terrorists’ July bombings in London, I was interviewing the fatwa-reprieved Salman Rushdie in New York. A year later, on the very day of the Heathrow drama, I was interviewing his great mate Martin Amis, also in New York, albeit in a secluded enclave in the Hamptons. On both occasions, current events inevitably featured in our discussions. If you believe, as I do, that literature can help to make sense of the life we are living, then the response of these guys should certainly command some attention.

I was born and brought up for the first ten years of my life in a Muslim country. I will be returning to that community in a small town in Kuwait — if I’m assured that it’s safe to do so — with my younger son this autumn. I hope to revisit the home I grew up in, and the garden, where I remember seeing the turbaned men, whom my father employed, downing tools and kneeling at regular times of the day, as the wailing muezzin called the faithful to prayer from their minarets. As a child it always struck me as a beautiful if mournful ritual. I never, ever, was inculcated with the sense that these people and their beliefs were in any way less than me and mine — although there must have been something in the ether even then, since I remember my parents spluttering when my eight-year-old self asked the visiting sheikh why he thought his religion was better than ours.

And so — I’m with Rushdie and Amis as I read all the sympathetic coverage in the liberal press about the poor, puzzled Muslims who feel that they are being picked on in airports and flights. If the parents of the young men who are attracted to this murderous martyrdom have lost control of their sons, then they must shoulder part of the blame. If the Muslims who choose to live in our society, with all its so-called tempting freedoms, do not protest against those who wish to destroy it, then how can they expect our tolerance? Why are the moderates not, in their hundreds and thousands, standing outside those mosques that are known to preach hatred, shouting “Not in our name” down their megaphones or “One, two, three, four, no more terror anymore”?

And where are the voices of the ordinary mothers and daughters and aunts from the Muslim community saying, “Enough. No more violence. No more deaths”, as did all those courageous women who helped to bring peace to Ireland? And if they, our Muslim sisters, are mute slaves to — or, worse, themselves in thrall to — the siren call of the death-wish culture, is there any hope for the rest of us?

Oh, and just by way of a postscript: you’ll never guess who was on my return Flight of Liberation, which ended in a two-hour wait for our baggage and a near-riot when there were no trolleys available . . . yes, Salman Rushdie.