SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (4755)8/29/2006 3:18:40 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224713
 
Yes, democrats will do a much better job on defense. We would be much safer from terrorism without Bush-Cheney in charge.

Just look at the results. It's true Bush-Cheney and DElay types talk very tough, but their actions are incompetent, two-faced and counter-productive. In fact, their #1 priorities in national defense all made us less safe and our military less strong and ready. You can't judge a book by its cover, you have to see what the substance is. The substance of Bush-Cheney's defense policy is full of deceit, domestic political tricks, wasteful spending, profiteering and subterfuge, and the results of it all have been abyssmal.

And sure, democrats are fine on defense. Murtha is our man in congress and no one is more qualified. Trying to make Pelosi seem like the next commander in chief is dishonest. Her focus is mainly on domestic issues. She delegates to Murtha on the Iraq War. Democrats have stellar expert leaders in defense and foreign policy, and they can work well with the more honest Republican types like Lugar, McCain. Graham and Hagel. But the Bushie Delay types all need to go. They have brought us nothing but waste, deceit and defeat.