SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: yaetmo who wrote (24606)8/29/2006 9:46:40 PM
From: Math Junkie  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 42834
 
"Well dija, since you are a non-subscriber, could it be you are assuming that he said to reduce/sell their QQQQ holdings when he issued new recommendations."

Are you saying the people who reported what he recommended can't be trusted?

I think Dija trusts me, so I will save him a trip to the library. Effective at the close on April 11, 2006, he said to sell 2/5 of the RYOCX in P1, 1/3 of the RYOCX in P2, and all of the RYOCX in P3. (When he originally recommended RYOCX, he said subscribers could substitute QQQ for it if they preferred.)



To: yaetmo who wrote (24606)8/30/2006 12:22:20 AM
From: dijaexyahoo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42834
 
--I would say that in April 06, he told those who had bought the QQQs per the March 2003 recommendation to sell part or all of THOSE QQQs.

yaetmo responded:

<<Well dija, since you are a non-subscriber, could it be you are assuming that he said to reduce/sell their QQQQ holdings when he issued new recommendations.

I suggest that you run down to your local library to actually read what changes Bob recommended in April '06. The nearest one to you is on Tropicana Ave between Nellis Blvd and Boulder Hwy>>

--Geez, talk about nit-picking! He said to sell the RYOCX (or whatever they are called) shares that were recommended in March 2003.

There was no indication that he was talking about the QQQ shares recommended in Oct. 2000.

That wasn't the point. The point under discussion was whether he was rude to her, or cut her off to keep her from mentioning the Oct. 2000 call. He wasn't, and he didn't.

If you want to concede those points, then we can move on to something else.