SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ild who wrote (69074)8/29/2006 10:04:34 PM
From: Ramsey Su  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 110194
 
biz.yahoo.com

another timely article about the default situation.

Early Subprime Mortgage Defaults Rising
Tuesday August 29, 6:09 pm ET
By Lingling Wei, Dow Jones Newswires
Subprime Mortgage Lenders Seeing Early Payment Defaults

NEW YORK (AP) -- More subprime borrowers are defaulting in the early months of their home loans, a trend that has led to greater fear among investors and lenders of rising delinquencies and losses.

For more than a year, shareholders in mortgage lenders and investors in mortgage-backed securities have worried that the end of the housing boom, along with higher interest rates, would cause more borrowers to default on their home loans, leading to more bank and investment losses. But credit quality industrywide has generally held firm, thanks to a still-strong economy and a robust job market. However, in recent months, an increasing number of lenders catering to borrowers with weak credit have reported a sharp rise in delinquencies that had occurred as soon as six months after origination.

ADVERTISEMENT
Nationwide, about three and a half subprime loans out of every 10,000 originated between January and June had a delinquency on their first monthly payment, according to LoanPerformance, a subsidiary of First American Real Estate Solutions. By comparison, only one out of every 10,000 subprime loans granted last year had experienced missed payment in their first month. LoanPerformance's data also show that so far this year, there has been a 14 percent increase in the number of nonprime mortgages with at least one missed payment in the first three months after origination.

"If those borrowers are finding themselves in trouble very early on, it may give lenders an indication that the underwriting criteria or quality control are not sufficiently tight," says Damien Weldon, director of collateral risk analytics at LoanPerformance. Based on the year-to-date data, Weldon says early payment defaults on subprime mortgages are expected to increase this year.

Those early defaults have forced lenders such as NetBank Inc., Fremont General Corp. and H&R Block Inc. to buy back loans already sold to whole-loan acquirers, particularly Wall Street investment banks that pool and package those loans into asset-backed securities and then sell them to large investors like insurance companies and hedge funds. The buybacks, in turn, have led lenders to incur losses and set aside more money in their reserve funds for potential loan repurchases in the future.

As recently as a week ago, H&R Block told investors that it expects to take a $102.1 million pre-tax charge, or $61.3 million after-tax, for losses related to rising delinquencies by its subprime mortgage borrowers. The Kansas City, Mo., tax-services firm, which has expanded into mortgage and other financial services, said "an increase in early payment delinquencies" and the resulting "higher level of repurchase requests from loan buyers" led it to increase its loan reserves. The company, which is to release its first-quarter earnings Thursday, didn't specify the reasons for those early defaults in the press release.

Some investors and analysts view the early hiccups as a sign of weakening mortgage credit. Alan Fournier, who runs Pennant Capital Management LLC, a Chatham, N.J., hedge fund with more than $1 billion under management, says although the housing market has already softened, as shown in a growing inventory of unsold homes and slowing home-price appreciation, "the credit cycle is just starting" to turn for the worse.

The secondary market, where lenders sell the new loans they create to manage risk as well as to have more funds available for making mortgages, could also see more pressure from rising delinquencies. Merrill Lynch analyst Kenneth Bruce wrote in a recent report commenting on H&R Block's announcement that "if the fixed-income market anticipates further losses, it could begin to pressure spreads on lower rated bonds, thus undermining whole-loan pricing." A potential decline in whole-loan pricing would eat into lenders' mortgage gain-on-sale income.

The subprime mortgage market has grown substantially in recent years, with total subprime loans outstanding representing about 13 percent of total mortgage loans outstanding. Subprime borrowers, who pay higher rates than prime borrowers due to their weak FICO scores (typically lower than 640) or a lack of documentation such as no income proof, tend to take on more debt and have less disposable income. A typical subprime mortgage represents 80 percent of the house value.

Such highly leveraged borrowers also have a greater tendency to refinance and take cash out when home prices rise. However, when home prices decline, as is now happening in many parts of the country, those borrowers may have fewer choices to tap into their homes' wealth to pay down debt, leading to more defaults on their home loans.



To: ild who wrote (69074)8/30/2006 1:00:56 PM
From: ild  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 110194
 
@peak oil -- trotsky, 12:57:51 08/30/06 Wed
the oil geologists bemoaning the imminent arrival of peak oil make a few good points - their best argument is imo the undeniable peak of US production in the 1970's, as well as the global discovery peak of the 1960's.
that said, they also leave a lot to be desired in terms of their proposed solutions. consider this statement from the earlier linked article
When Oil Dries Up.
p088.ezboard.com

apart from the fact that oil alarmist Heinberg (who apparently makes a good living writing and lecturing about the stuff) is a self-admitted Malthusian resource depletion worrier - a branch of alarmism that continues to run into the endless fount of human ingenuity as it were - he's saying THIS:

"If you look at the end of the process it's not hard to paint a fairly attractive picture. The problem is how we get there - very few communities are planning for this transition. [But] if we just let market forces rule, the result is going to be economic, political and social chaos in the intervening period."

then he goes on to laud Sweden - Sweden! the socialist utopia in decline! - for having produced a paper - government-sponsored of course - which has 'the imprimatur of the Prime Minister, Goran Persson' (will he produce energy somehow?) in which it is proposed to make Sweden an 'oil-free society by 2020'. i guess we should commiserate with the Swedes - not only will they keep suffering under the socialist yoke, by 2020 they will also sit in the dark and walk instead of driving.

so , if we 'let the market rule' we shall have 'chaos'.
what utter tripe. this is the problem with the entire bunch of oil alarmists - they cry out for government intervention and regimentation, as if the bureaucracy could somehow muster better ideas to overcome the problem than the market.
then there is the additional fact that the alarmists fail to acknowledge the economics of resource extraction (in this context note that in the mid 1800ds, the coming of 'peak coal' was a big topic).
has anyone ever wondered how it is possible that e.g. a gold mine that had reserves of say 5m. oz. at the beginning of its life continues to produce after those 5m. oz. have been extracted, and often has quite a few years of production still ahead of it? the reason is that it is not economic to prove up ALL of the reserves so far ahead of their extraction. rather, producers prove up additional reserves along with the depletion process. thus it's quite possible that the mine in the example produces 500k. oz. in one year, and thereafter STILL has 5m. oz. of reserves left - because an additional 500k. oz. have been proven up during the first year of extraction.
this makes oil peak forecasts a tricky business. how reliable is our knowledge of the ultimate amount of recoverable oil? global usage of 86m. bbl./day sounds like a lot, but consider that ALL the oil EVER produced would only fill about two thirds of Lake Tahoe.
that said, we WILL have a problem if Campbell et al. are right about an imminent production peak. however, it is definitely erroneous to believe that government intervention can save the day in that case. i prefer to put my trust in the market any day - where human inventiveness and entrepreneurship are cherished and remunerated is also whence a solution to any problems with future oil production is most likely to come forth.