Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (301779)	8/31/2006 6:53:51 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572932

No. 4 1/2% lower. Now your just talking nonsense. 4 and 1/2 percent lower would be close to no unemployment. This whole conversation is nonsense. I can't believe I let it go on as long as I have. Whether the lowest unemployment rate was 3.7% or 3.9%, the point is that things were so much better under Clinton than under Bush when it came to the middle and lower classes. Only the rich have prospered under Bush. Now you can screw with that all you want but it doesn't change the facts. And there will come a point when the GOP will look like Antoinette extolling the virtues of eating cake.....with a beheading or two not far behind.