To: GST who wrote (200328 ) 8/30/2006 8:19:08 PM From: Brumar89 Read Replies (1) | Respond to Okay as promised, I've pulled together the posts in which you demonstrate beyond all doubt that you're a liar with a powerful anti-American bias as well as a slavish ass-licker of the Communist Chinese government (which per your own admission elsewhere is how you make your living). Enjoy: http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=19137751We intentionally bombed the Chinese embassy -- I think is was the wrong thing to do, but it was no accident . I give credit to China for showing maturity on that issue and not triggering a bigger, uglier and more long-lived response. Can you imagine what we would do if China bombed one of our embassies? Message 19138164 intentionally bomb an embassy is to intentionally attack a country on its own soil. That is what we did to China . The Chinese took it in stride, although it leaves a very negative impression. If China intentionally bombed us on our own soil, the feelings and attitudes of hostility that would be unleashed towards China would last a lifetime. It would be reflected in all of our policy decisions and the hawks would call for war every day of the week. http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=19139754It was not an accident. I have multiple sources on the US side and I know for a fact that the Chinese did not think it was an accident because I had the "pleasure" of discussing it with them. http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=19145118suggesting it was likely true -- but I do not have hard evidence and make no firm first-hand claim . The point of my post was simply this: Whatever happened, China is convinced it was intentional. That much I know from my direct experience at the time. http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=19148214I did not make a charge , I told you what is widely believed and was thoroughly discussed. It certainly does not revolve around me personally -- my knowledge is specific only to the Chinese reaction because I was there and played a minor role in communications. If you are interested in finding out what is going on, you should be showing some interest in where these Niger forgeries came from and who did the forging and promoting of them in the first place. If they came from Washington, I assume it would be treason. http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=19149983I would never say to the Chinese, "ya, we hit you on purpose" . Get a grip. If we did hit their embassy on purpose (and I know of no conclusive information one way or the other , although it was officially investigated), then it was most likely for the reasons I mentioned. And if that was the case, then neither the US nor China would want to make too much of it. China would not wan a lengthy discussion if they were in fact interfering, and we would not want a lengthy discussion if we responded with a "warning" attack. I will never know if it was intentional -- I only know what the Chinese thought at the time, and the rumblings from others in the aftermath.
