SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: YanivBA who wrote (69174)8/31/2006 11:06:12 AM
From: russwinter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
I think you are mixing short term paper with a longer term paper.>

You can use the two or five Treasury/BAAspread also, which is about 25 basis point more. But still I'd have to ask (applying some intuitive thinking) which is riskier, a one year Treasury or a five year? Kind of illustrates another level of maturity risk taking going on, that on top of credit spreads, don't you think?



To: YanivBA who wrote (69174)8/31/2006 11:56:20 AM
From: Ramsey Su  Respond to of 110194
 
biz.yahoo.com

here is another one of these deals that in essence, the issuer is retaining 2.36% of the riskiest tranches.

NovaStar retained the M-7, M-10, M-11 and M-12 certificates. Collectively, these certificates represent $23.6 million in principal. The M-10, M-11 and M-12 certificates were not covered by the prospectus. Ratings for the M-7, M-10, M-11 and M-12 certificates follow:


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News