SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: slacker711 who wrote (54871)8/31/2006 10:40:00 PM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 196986
 
I don't know why a judge would go to the trouble of writing a 47 page opinion, then dismiss a case "without prejudice."

I've tried searching for the decision on PACER without any luck.

But it is definitely awesome as the judge apparently wrote that competition would not be harmed by Q's licensing practices. We should get a nice boost tomorrow.



To: slacker711 who wrote (54871)8/31/2006 10:40:29 PM
From: slacker711  Read Replies (6) | Respond to of 196986
 
For those interested, I posted the ruling in the anti-trust case at the following Yahoo group. It absolutely takes apart the anti-trust case....hope Europe is paying attention.

finance.groups.yahoo.com

Slacker


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News