Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Polite Political Discussion- is it Possible? An Experiment. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: thames_sider who wrote (1244)	9/1/2006 8:04:39 AM
From: Bread Upon The Water	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1695

We disagree about what are fundamental premises are. You, apparently, think that the evidence of the last 100 years means humans can adapted their psyches in the same manner they have adapted their behavioral interaction with the environment. I, apparently, think that there exists an archetypical role for the role of the sexes that has evolved into what it is for reasons that DO have to do with evolutionary success, and to ignore the stereotypes that that evolutionary role has produced can only be done at great cost and psychic warfare. It would help me with my argument if a Jungian psychologist could weigh in here. What is, Who are, the experts you would need---William James(?)-- B. F. Skinner (?) Why are you, as a man, so ready to buy into the role change for woman being advocated here? What is in it for you and why do you think it will work for society?