SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (301945)9/1/2006 9:30:20 AM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575624
 
"The important question now, however, is whether we’re finally going to try to do something about the big disconnect. "

Probably not. There are too many people like Tim who view the present situation as a good thing.



To: Road Walker who wrote (301945)9/1/2006 11:11:13 AM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575624
 
"every other advanced country manages to provide everyone with health insurance, while spending less on health care than we do."

What every other country DOESN'T do with it's money is spend as much as the rest of the world COMBINED on it's military. Only WE do that. The "axis of evil" doesn't. China and Russia don't. WE are the only country on earth that blows so much cake for such a poor return.

globalsecurity.org

What are we afraid of? OUR land neighbors are Canada and Mexico!



To: Road Walker who wrote (301945)9/1/2006 5:10:29 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575624
 
Message 22771630

"The income share of the top quintile rose to 50.4% from 50.1% in 2001 while the bottom two quintiles lost 0.1% each and the third and fourth quintiles were unchanged (discrepancy due to rounding). And only the 0.1% change for the lowest quintile is statistically significant (i.e. non-zero) at conventional confidence levels.

Meanwhile, the Gini index has been bouncing up and down between .46 and .47 since 2000 after rising steadily throughout the Clinton years from .43 in 1992 (it was .42 in the mid-1980s).

In short, income equality took a big hit in the 1990s and has been essentially unchanged since Bush took office.

Oh, and the mean incomes of households in each quintile all rose in 2005, so any gains for the top quintile came at the expense of no one."

Message 22767344