SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (302025)9/1/2006 7:16:05 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 1575791
 
I wonder -- not sarcastically, but sincerely -- where Krugman's data on employee benefits come from. After spending too much time fruitlessly scouring the BLS site for such data, I asked the BLS for such data. I was told that the BLS "does not provide either total compensation nor non-wage benefits for non-supervisory workers. We produce only earnings data for non-supervisory workers."

The BLS does have a data series on annual-percentage-rate changes in real total compensation for all nonfarm employees. (Russ cited it in this recent post; it's Series #PRS85006152.) According to this series real nonfarm-worker total compensation has increased about 40 percent since December 2000 -- but much or all of this increase might be due to increases in real compensation paid only to the economy's most bodaciously rich workers.

But who knows? How does Krugman know?

cafehayek.typepad.com



To: TimF who wrote (302025)9/1/2006 8:23:23 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575791
 
When you talk about "benefit compensation" are you talking gross or percentage? To suggest that more companies are increasing their benefits than decreasing their benefits is absolutely ludicrous. And kills your "increased compensation" argument.

People are earning less for the same work... we all know that Don Quixote.