SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: geode00 who wrote (200701)9/1/2006 7:34:59 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
You have got to be kidding. People --- all people --- come and go.

Really??!!! Please tell me you're next in line.. LOL!!!



To: geode00 who wrote (200701)9/1/2006 8:07:41 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 281500
 
Republicans tense as voter disillusionment sets in

usatoday.com

Updated 8/31/2006 11:39 PM ET

By Jill Lawrence and Susan Page, USA TODAY

EMMAUS, Pa. — The buzzing of 150 friends and neighbors quieted as Kathleen Miller told them about her older son, a Marine who was injured in Iraq, and her younger son, who is in the Army and has orders to go there in October.

"I am afraid," Miller said. "That's why we need Bob Casey, so he can join a Democratic Congress and help find a solution to this war."

Miller, a Democratic activist, delivered her stark message in a wood-and-brick barn decked with balloons, sparkly white lights and Casey himself. The state treasurer, son of the late governor Bob Casey, had a double-digit lead over two-term Republican Sen. Rick Santorum in a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll last week.

Iraq is one of several tides running against GOP candidates, driving away independent voters and some party faithful. Except for Missouri, independent voters in five Senate races polled by USA TODAY were swinging toward the Democrat. Party loyalty was stronger among Democrats than Republicans in every state but Ohio.

President Bush's anemic job approval, underscored this week by the anniversary of Hurricane Katrina, is a drag on Republicans almost everywhere. His rating hasn't risen above 42% in six months. Other problems facing Republicans:

•Corruption and ethics. The climate is particularly troubled for Ohio Republicans. Gov. Bob Taft last year pleaded no contest to charges that he violated state ethics laws. Rep. Bob Ney, under investigation for his ties to convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff, said he would not seek re-election. Even Sen. Mike DeWine, not entangled in either scandal, says the issue hurts him.

In Montana, Sen. Conrad Burns was the top recipient of campaign donations from Abramoff, his clients and political allies. "Ethics is the issue" in the race, says political scientist James Lopach of the University of Montana. He says Burns is helped by his "folksy, agricultural, working-person" persona, but says Democrat Jon Tester, a farmer, is a strong challenger: "He also symbolizes what a lot of Montanans think of themselves — close to the land, hard-working, straightforward."

•Social issues. Some conservatives press views that are unpopular with a majority of Americans. Santorum, the No. 3 Senate Republican, is a national spokesman on cultural issues and helped lead last year's drive for congressional intervention in the Terri Schiavo case. He called court decisions allowing removal of the Florida woman's feeding tube "unconscionable."

In Missouri, voters will decide this fall whether to amend their constitution to protect embryonic stem cell research and ban human cloning. The initiative has thrust stem cell research, which has broad support in polls, into the forefront of the Senate race.

Democratic challenger Claire McCaskill has championed the cause. GOP Sen. Jim Talent opposes the initiative but says voters should reach their own decisions about a "very difficult moral issue."

Stem cell research divides business-oriented Republicans from the party's social conservatives, says political scientist Michael Minta of Washington University in St. Louis: "It's a dilemma" for the GOP.

•Economic issues. Stagnant wages, high gas prices and rising health care costs are top concerns in Pennsylvania and Ohio. "For working people ... all things are going pretty bad right now," says Jim Sherwood, 42, a painter and union official from Cleveland.

Sherwood and three other members of the Painters' Union were at Trinity Episcopal Cathedral in Cleveland to hear Senate candidate Sherrod Brown and others stump for a ballot initiative to increase the state minimum wage from $4.25 to $6.85 an hour.

"For 10 years, no minimum wage increase" at the federal level while members of Congress saw their pay rise six times, Brown, a seven-term House member, told the crowd. "That's not the kind of family values most of us believe in." He said later that Ohio voters feel their government "has betrayed them."

The next day, DeWine was just four blocks away to tout the jobs he's brought to Ohio. The two-term senator put on a hard hat and a safety vest to inspect work on the widening of Euclid Avenue. As a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, DeWine says he landed $47 million for the project.

Later, sipping peppermint tea in a nearby coffee shop, DeWine acknowledged that the political climate was tough for Republicans. "We all swim in the same ocean," he said, and there are "choppy waters" this year.

Voters raised economic worries repeatedly at a Casey rally last week in Jim Thorpe, Pa. "The gap is ever-widening" between the rich and everyone else, said Ronald Rabenold, a fifth-grade teacher and union official from Lehighton.

Santorum says Casey's economic plan is higher taxes and bigger government. "He is sort of a European socialist," he said. Casey, who opposes Bush's tax cuts, laughed and called the tag "preposterous."

In the end, some experts say, national security could be the decisive issue — but unlike in most elections, it's unclear which party will benefit. "The Republicans are relying on this image of them being strong on defense and the war on terror, and their ability to portray Democrats as weak," says Bob Benenson, editor of the non-partisan CQPolitics.com. He adds: "This could be a totally different year."

The reason is Iraq. In recent USA TODAY/Gallup polls, majorities said it was a mistake to send U.S. troops and that they should come home either immediately or within a year.

Republican Peter Vaughan, an energy consultant in Pittsburgh, calls the U.S. presence in Iraq "a vexing question" and worries it will hurt Santorum. "My biggest fear is that we're not going to marshal enough support to win," he says.

Standing in Miller's barn, Casey says Santorum hasn't asked Bush the hard questions senators need to ask in a time of war. Santorum said in an interview that the tactics used to fight the war have not been "even close to perfect." But he added, "I'm perfectly happy to run this race on national security issues."

Brian Souerwine of Macungie embodies the tough electoral realities facing Santorum and his party. The retired teacher switched his registration from Republican to Democrat six months ago and plans to vote for Casey.

He doesn't like what's going on with Iraq, the economy or federal education policy. "There are a whole lot of disillusioned people in our country," Souerwine says.



To: geode00 who wrote (200701)9/1/2006 8:17:44 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Republican Advantage on Issue Of National Security Erodes

online.wsj.com

Iraq and Handling of Katrina Shift Sentiment as Races
For Congress Heat Up
By JACKIE CALMES
September 1, 2006

In both national elections since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, President Bush and congressional Republicans successfully played the national-security card to win big victories against the odds. Now, with their party's control of Congress at stake, Republicans are betting on the issue again. But it may not be the trump card it used to be.

The public's patience has frayed as the Iraq war grows bloodier in its fourth year, eroding confidence in Mr. Bush's stewardship of national security. Mismanagement of the response to Hurricane Katrina contributed. Democrats, having ceded the security issue to Republicans in the past, now are on the offensive. They're attacking the administration's competence at home and abroad and fielding candidates with military experience.

Democrats are also pressing an argument opposite to the president's: that Iraq isn't central to the broader war on terror but distracts from it, and breeds more terrorists. How voters ultimately decide on that issue is "one of the most important dynamics of this election," says Republican pollster David Winston.

A Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll in June, buttressed by other polls since, suggested Democrats have gained significant ground. It gave them a three-point advantage on the question of which party can best deal with Iraq, erasing Republicans' 30-point edge of October 2002. Democrats had a nine-point edge on handling foreign policy, a swing from Republicans' 18-point advantage in June 2002. Republicans did retain a 24-point advantage on "ensuring a strong national defense" -- though that was down from a high of 41 points just before 9/11.

The intensifying debate was on full display in Salt Lake City yesterday, where Mr. Bush set the theme for what will be a sustained pre-election push to make the Republicans' case on national security. He told the American Legion's national convention that leaving Iraq now would be "absolutely disastrous," providing a base of operations for global terrorists who are "successors to fascists, to Nazis, to communists and other totalitarians" the veterans helped battle. Back in Washington, the Republican National Committee struck a new political note, with a widely distributed email against Democrats titled "The Defeatocrat Playbook."

A laboratory for how that fight plays out is suburban Philadelphia. Ten-term Republican Rep. Curt Weldon, a senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, is running his toughest re-election campaign yet, with full-throated support for the Iraq war. "We either fight them there," Mr. Weldon recently said of terrorists, "or we fight them in the supermarkets and streets here." He still insists there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

Stuart Rothenberg, a veteran nonpartisan handicapper of congressional races, recently rated Mr. Weldon's a tossup. The Democratic challenger is Joe Sestak, a former vice admiral who served in Afghanistan. Two weeks ago, Democratic leaders tapped him to deliver the party's weekly response to Mr. Bush's Saturday radio address. Mr. Sestak charged that the administration, by its attention to Iraq, had ignored Iran "as it developed a nuclear capability," as well as North Korea, "now launching missiles." Recalling his own stint in Afghanistan, he said that country now "is in danger of once again falling prey to terrorists." And the alleged terrorist plot in London, Mr. Sestak added, "forces us to ask: Are we doing everything possible to make America safe?"

Against this backdrop, Labor Day kicks off the candidates' traditional sprint to Election Day, Nov. 7, with Republicans increasingly fretful at the prospect of losing their House, and possibly Senate, majorities. Polls since last year have shown the public's approval ratings for Mr. Bush and the Republican-led Congress at historic lows. Voters by low double-digit margins continue to say they'd prefer Democrats to run Congress.

Even most Republicans see little ahead that could change the picture for the better. As usual, they have more money to make their case, but Democrats have narrowed the gap. Republicans are spending millions to defend seats they thought would be safe, leaving them strapped for helping their challengers running against Democratic incumbents.

By all accounts, Republicans will suffer net losses. Both Mr. Rothenberg and Charlie Cook, another respected political analyst, now predict that Democrats will gain at least the 15 seats they need to control the House, based on current trends. That likely would mean defeats for some of the few remaining Republican moderates from New England across the Middle West. They are vulnerable this year, by association with an unpopular president and congressional leadership, among less-conservative voters who feel neither safer nor economically secure. Most analysts expect Democrats to fall short of the six-seat gain they need for a Senate majority, given that Republicans have fewer seats than Democrats to defend this year.

Many factors have combined to turn the tables against the party in power: worsening chaos and casualties in Iraq, economic insecurity and high gasoline prices, congressional corruption, conservatives mutinous about Republicans' spending record, and an anti-incumbent mood this year that gives the majority more to lose.

Republicans are left with one remaining strong suit -- voters' sense, going back a half-century to the Cold War against communism, that they are better able than Democrats to keep the nation secure.

"It's still an enormously potent issue" for Republicans, says party strategist and former Rep. Vin Weber. His party's historical advantage on national security is the wild card, he argues, that makes these midterm elections less predictable than in years past -- such as 1994, when Republicans broke Democrats' 40-year domination of Congress amid voters' disgust with Democrats' unkept promises on domestic issues, or 1974, when Democrats swept scores of Republicans from office in the wake of the Watergate scandal.