Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (302046)	9/14/2006 10:33:18 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 1575424

OK, I'll take that at face value. But if you are against "corporate welfare", then you certainly should be against the Bush admin. I'm against it on that issue. (And also against other administrations). You attack it on that issue and I'll either stay silent or joint in support. The only way I might argue against is if your point talks about other administrations not being a problem this way, and that's not defending Bush but rather attacking the records of the other administrations. But if you attack Bush, on something else, and I think your wrong, should I shut up or support you because Bush is a supporter of corporate welfare? Tell me where you disagree with this admin (outside of the deficits which nobody agrees with). I could answer with how I think he's worse than other administrations, or how I think he doesn't measure up to my ideal. If I post the later I will have a long list but much of it will also apply to other administrations. And more than a little of it will be how he didn't go far enough in some areas (for example tax cuts, and his weak attempt at entitlement reform) Is Iraq a libertarian core value? Being against Iraq, or being against war isn't a libertarian core value. However I'm pretty sure a majority of libertarians are against the war.