Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (302051)	9/3/2006 3:40:38 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1576251

Ted, one of the local radio stations brought up a good point. When it comes to air pollution, California is going to take matters into its own hands. And their action is appropriate. The feds have set standards for the country based on average air quality for the nation as a whole. Those standards are great for MPLS which has few pollution days but stink for CA because of CA's peculiar climatic and topographic issues. Furthermore, nearly all of CA's pollution is generated intrastate and does not, for the most part, migrate from some other location like China or NK. But when it comes to illegal immigration, California says, "Nope! That's the job of the federal government!" My tax dollars at work ... Again that's appropriate........look at the interstate commerce acts........states barely have control over their own borders let alone the borders of the US. Illegal immigration policy has to be set on a national basis so that the borders are treated with equanimity throughout the US.