SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (50849)9/2/2006 8:43:56 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90947
 
Why wasn't Armitage indicted? The prosecutor knew from nearly the beginning he was the leaker. If it was a crime to reveal the info, he should h/b indicted.

The point is that it wasn't Rove, Cheney, or the WH - it was Powell's buddy, Armitage that did the leak. The prosecutor and the MSM knew this all along yet fed the public a lie that people closely associated with Bush leaked the info for vindictive reasons.



To: tejek who wrote (50849)9/4/2006 6:11:04 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
How could a depty secretary of state not know that disclosing Ms. Phlame's cover was goving out classified info? I know that many of Bush appointees are incompetent....but really!
There's some real imcompetence about clearances being demonstrated here, but it isn't Armitage's- -it's YOURS.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News