Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (24764)	9/2/2006 9:14:02 PM
From: dijaexyahoo	Respond to of 42834

honey said: <<You will find your questions answered at our old stomping grounds. There's some major stomping going on there now, too.>> --Do I get one guess as to which side is being stomped? -:) <<You still haven't hit bottom yet, I see...all it takes for one to be your best friend is to lie about me, so you can swear to it.>> --What did I "swear to???" I asked you about 4 questions in that post. You didn't answer any of them. What are you trying to hide?

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (24764)	9/4/2006 1:57:13 PM
From: queenleah	Respond to of 42834

Why do you attack dija for asking a simple question, a question I was asking myself also when I came back online? Has anyone answered it anywhere without going to 101? I guess I have a little different attitude about "censorship" here. Seems they do try to keep this a bit more on-topic and up-scale place. Nothing wrong with that. If posters are simply interested in attacking and deriding some other poster with whom they disagree just to attempt to make the other look stupid or inept or undesirable (which is some people's modus operandi) they deserve to have a post deleted. And if they continue to be scoff-laws they deserve what they get. They know the rules, or should. As long as the rules are applied justly across the board, I have no problem with it.