Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (14443)	9/3/2006 8:18:41 PM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Ah...I see...because you say so. Very nice proof, numbnut. You said you would come back and answer the questions. Well? Now... WHAT accounts for the freefall of the buildings? Building 7 fell at the speed of freefall in a vaccuum. What created the vaccuum? WHAT accounts for the release of energy during the collapses that reduced not only the concrete to an average of 30 micron-sized dust particles but most of the buildings' contents as well AND the subsequent pyroclastic flows being many multiples that of the energy that was available due to a gravitational collapse? Hint...Explosive devices is the only answer. So... A.) Explosive devices B.) You have no rational explanation C.) You choose to ignore the question because answering A or B is not within your purview. Here are the numbers you have to explain for just one tower: All units in KwH 135,000 required for crushing of concrete (9e10 g to 60 micron powder) ignoring water vaporization 400,000 for heating of gasses (2e9 g air from 300 to 1020 K) 11,300,000 for heating of suspended concrete (9e10 g from 300 to 1020 K) assuming water vaporization sink was not supply-limited 1,496,000 for vaporization of water (2.38e9 g water) 41,000 for heating of gasses (2e9 g air from 300 to 373 K) 1,145,000 for heating of suspended concrete (9e10 g from 300 to 373 K) Here is the amount of energy in KwH available from gravity collapse: 111,000 falling of mass (1.97e11 g falling average of 207 m) 911review.com Tear into it. There's only a disparity of 14.4 million Kwh. Should be easy to explain to us all where 14.4 million KwH came from...right? Explaining the vaccuum and the freefall speeds should be a breeze once you find the source for 14.4 million KwH.