Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (8906)	9/4/2006 12:19:01 PM
From: elmatador	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219497

I noted that I am the only person in planet earth that can see everything happening at a single go. The common mortal, only can see something happening and relate to what is immediately in its surround. There is this intuitive understanding that I look around and don't see many people capable of having it. I imagine the whole thing. I imagine the butterfly wing-beat and can picture the sweat in Lloyds of London. I saw the CNN footage 2003 Shock and Awe and told: US gets its Israel. Last week I heard peacekeepers ready to move into Lebanon I wrote: get supply of body bags. It's clear fro me. How it is not for other people? CAUSE AND EFFECT. If there's a cause, there'll be an effect and there's nothing we can do to avoid the effect. What I was trying to say, in Eplay example, that if the price of labor goes up due to a limited supply, we won't have rollover, into the next cheap place. There will not be a cheap place to rollover into. Countries' economy will change based on that, limited supply of labor. Moon has to understand that we are talking about a limited supply of labor. Forget capital. Once we reach that point, capital won't be an issue. It would have been spread evenly all over the place. Now back to my point. My point was: In a world where labor, (labor understood as people able to work in a modern economy, not idle hands and legs) is scarce countries will specialize based on their labor's abilities. As a result, it will be better to go get the best people to do the jobs they are good elsewhere rather than use the local cat-fish brains just because they happen to have the local passport. You'd be throwing money at a bad brains instead of go get the better guys elsewhere. What we're seeing today with free flow of capital and goods is nothing compared with the free flow of labor. Labor conditions in all countries are all artificial to protect the cushy jobs of the locals.. Make free the flow of labor and instead of disassembling the industry and reassembly it in China, it would be feasible to keep it at home. It is not happening? China is profiting from it. Because 1.3 billion Chinese can move free across the country and those postal stamp countries are seeing their jobs going away for good. We have to understand that economics as a science was made for a time the world faced scarcity of everything. Educated people and capital. Those basic rules are no longer valid. Today it is another set of circumstances we're dealing with. Countries which are subversive and violated the rule book are the ones who stand a chance. And it is not difficult. It is extremely easy. Go tell this to the governing elites of the countries that have large pool of labor. I succeeded because I saw the flaws and exploited them to my advantage.