Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp. - A Scam? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SI Dave who wrote (808)	9/5/2006 9:42:23 AM
From: yardslave	Respond to of 4624

I have stated this before, I don't have a problem with the moderated board, and it does not surprise me at all that ihub has more traffic. But, it is not for me. I'm just saying that Ihub is more attractive to the longs/pumpers than SI is. With the model the way it is, it always will be. Tweaking here and there is not going to change that. I for one, will probably not post there an a regular bases. However, there are a lot more longs and pumpers than there ever will be bashers. SI may very well be a victim of its own success, or the success of the bashers, depending on your point of view. For the most part, longs and pumpers (and I really hate referring to people in such a polarizing way, but it can't be helped in this discussion), don't like to post on boards where there might be a negative opinion on there favorite pet stock. Again, using PLNI as an example. I nor anyone else that I know would have any objection to any of the longs posting on the unmoderated board. However, they don't. I understand that Ihub has much more traffic, and pays the bills. Just don't try to tell me that it is now or ever will be a fair and balanced message board system. It never will be given the way that it is set up.