Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doug R who wrote (14779)	9/6/2006 3:36:26 PM
From: David Howe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

<<< Supposed cellphone calls describing Arab hijackers that were impossible to make...what dimwit thought that would fly? >>> Apparently in your mind it's the same dimwit that masterminded every one of the events on 9/11. THAT doesn't make any sense. A group that is smart enough to pull off the events of 9/11 and hide it from the public is also a dimwit in your mind? Obviously phone calls from planes are possible, particularly planes that are flying low (as these planes were). Credit card phones work at all elevations and cell phones work at lower elevations. Duh. Now, I'm really trying to understand you. Now you are saying that you don't think that the planes were taken over by "Arab" hijackers? Is THIS how far your conspiracy extends?

To: Doug R who wrote (14779)	9/6/2006 3:42:20 PM
From: David Howe	Respond to of 20039

<<< There are ongoing civil suits...quite a few. >>> Let me know when a civil case pointing to a conspiracy in our government is successful. I'm waiting. <<< As for a criminal case... There are literally hundreds of pieces of circumstantial evidence pointing to the bush/cheney crime syndicate (bccs). >>> Than a case should be easy to prove, even easier to get into a court of some kind, any kind. Since the evidence is so plentiful nd so obvious according to you, I'm sure a court case will take place eventually. Let me know when it happens, I'm waiting.

To: Doug R who wrote (14779)	9/6/2006 3:50:17 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Truth scares Democrats:9/11 miniseries under fire By SHAUN WATERMAN UPI Homeland and National Security Editor WASHINGTON, Sept. 6 (UPI) -- An upcoming TV mini-series about the origins of the Sept. 11 plot is provoking angry complaints from Democrats about the portrayal of the Clinton administration's response to terrorism. "The Path to 9/11," a five-hour dramatization laying out the history of the Sept. 11 plot from the first bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993, will be aired over two nights on the anniversary of the attack next week by ABC Television. The movie is billed as a dramatization based on the report of the U.S. commission that investigated the events of Sept. 11 and circumstances leading up to it. According to a disclaimer shown at the beginning of each episode, it "has composite and representative characters and incidents, and time compressions have been used for dramatic purposes." But a portion of the film showing an aborted effort to capture al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden before the 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies in East Africa has aroused the ire of some of the officials portrayed. A statement from Samuel "Sandy" Berger, who was national security adviser to President Bill Clinton at the time, calls the scenes involving him "complete fabrications." And Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y., called on ABC to show disclaimers throughout each episode, not just at the beginning. "ABC has a responsibility to make clear that this film is not a documentary, and does not represent an official account of the facts surrounding the Sept. 11 attacks," she said. In one scene, CIA operatives working with Ahmed Shah Masud, the charismatic Afghan mujahedin leader who fought al-Qaida and their Taliban sponsors, are assembled on a hillside above bin Laden's residence at Tarnak Farms. "It's perfect for us," says "Kirk," a composite character representing several of the CIA operatives and analysts involved in the hunt for the terrorist leader. But the team is forced to abort the mission when Berger hangs up on them in the middle of a conference call, after telling them he cannot give the go ahead for the action. "I don't have that authority," he says. "Are there any men in Washington," Masud asks Kirk afterwards in the film, "or are they all cowards?" "The incidents depicted did not happen," said Berger in the statement. "They are not contained in the Sept. 11 Commission report, which is the most authoritative review of the events before and after the attack." Indeed, the commission's report -- although it reveals the Clinton White House was concerned about the possible repercussions of a failed capture effort -- says that it was CIA Director George Tenet who nixed the capture plan, which would never have involved U.S. personnel in the assault, and which was canceled before being put into operation. Officials from both the White House and the CIA have characterized the back-and-forth about the plan as a breakdown of communications. The White House believed that they were authorizing the killing of bin Laden, but those at the CIA charged with carrying out the operation itself saw their authority limited to a capture operation that might result in his death. "There were shouting matches" between senior officials about the plan, said one senior member of the Sept. 11 commission staff who spoke on condition of anonymity because he is now working in a sensitive government position. However, the staffer said, the scene at Tarnak Farms "didn't happen, and frankly it's silly." But former GOP Governor Thomas Kean of New Jersey, the chairman of the Sept. 11 commission and a consultant to the production, defended the film, saying it showed "a colossal failure of government. "If you portray that accurately," he added, "people from both (the Clinton and Bush) administrations will complain." "I would say it's balanced," Kean said.