Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ichy Smith who wrote (201720)	9/7/2006 9:34:13 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

The short answer is because it is right to support the plan. Every American lives on stolen land. Let us discuss returning Israel to the Palestinians, and now what about Texas, and California? Mexico would like them back, i am sure. Alaska belong to the Russians, but before that it belonged to the natives, shall we return that as well. There are vast expanses of the Midwest ceded by treaty to the Natives and then stolen, do we give that back as well? Parts of France belonged to England, how do we approach that? How far back do you want to take this policy? As someone with some native blood i would like all the Muslims off my property. What do you think? My post didn't discuss stolen land, historical justification for land ownership, or any of the points you just brought up. I said... Why would any sane Jewish person want to live in a country which is surrounded by these intolerant, blood thirsty Muslims? The Muslim neighbors obviously aren't going away, and your post indicates that the Muslim neighbors aren't going to reform into a more tolerant group, so the only conclusion is endless warfare between 6 million Israelis and 200 million surrounding Muslims. Why should the USA support that plan?