Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Vasogen-- VAS on TSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stephen O who wrote (367)	9/7/2006 11:34:53 AM
From: Clarksterh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 377

Doesn't it just mean that celacade did not work worth a damn with the others and worked very well with the Class II group. Nope - in order to get that good a p value in that large a 'subgroup' the remainder of the population would (if you believed the p values) actually be significantly hurt by the treatment. Given that I think this is unlikely in the extreme this is probably an indication that the subgroup p values are not 'real' (i.e. they just kept picking subgroups until they inevitably found one that had a good p value. Note that you can ***ALWAYS** do this if you, for instance, have 10 parameters and look for all intersections and unions of combos up to 2. ALWAYS!!!!!! And that is what Vasogen has done. Absolutely and positively.)