SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (241)9/7/2006 1:59:32 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 10087
 
I think the focus of the effort was on professors that where considered incorrigible. Whether they where, or whether they were all even that bad in the first place can of course be debated. But even if the effort is some times mistaken, and even potentially harmful, I don't think it is sinister. I don't think it is similar to the situation in Iran, although to be fair the Islamic fundamentalists probably don't think their efforts are sinister either. Still I don't have a problem with the idea of saying that they are wrong. I'm far from being a complete relativist.



To: Lane3 who wrote (241)9/7/2006 2:16:42 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10087
 
Call for no-consent euthanasia

Doctors should be able to end lives swiftly and humanely, says professor

Sarah Boseley , health editor
Thursday June 8, 2006
The Guardian

One of the country's leading experts on medical ethics today calls for doctors to be able to end the lives of some terminally ill patients "swiftly, humanely and without guilt" - even if they have not given consent.
Len Doyal, emeritus professor of medical ethics at Queen Mary, University of London, takes the euthanasia debate into new and highly contentious territory. He says doctors should recognise that they are already killing patients when they remove feeding tubes from those whose lives are judged to be no longer worth living. Some will suffer a "slow and distressing death" as a result.

guardian.co.uk



To: Lane3 who wrote (241)9/7/2006 5:02:33 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10087
 
Don't you think that the administrations, at the department level, at least, are aware of the political positions of the faculty and approve of them?

You were a science major and I was a history/poly sci major. In history and poly sci having a liberal axe to grind seemed to me like it was not only normal but expected. Overtly right-wing students got zapped.