Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (144803)	9/7/2006 6:00:53 PM
From: JeffreyHF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Maurice, if Art were being facetious, and I took him literally, I apologize. I haven`t heard Art say that, publicly nor privately, but that`s neither here nor there. My reaction was to the suggestion that he had inside information concerning earnings. That`s a dangerous road to travel, even in jest. Peace. (P.S. Large legal fees may have been necessary to remove and sanitize the dung thrown by Broadcom`s archer, David Boies, from the courthouse wall. Good lawyering is expensive, but inadequate lawyering costs far more.)

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (144803)	9/7/2006 6:02:08 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

I could perhaps have got the same result for a tiny fraction of the cost. Hmmm.......I don't think so. You would have been devoured in an instant by the opposition. And lost me a lot of money in the process. There is a big difference between doing and understanding. You probably understand a lot about how CDMA and law work, but actually building chips and litigating cases are vastly different things than reading and forming judgments about those two activities. We can enjoy movies, then wonder why it is that actors get paid so much since all they do is act. Gee whiz, anyone can do it. Heck, helicopters have been around since Da Vinci dreamed them up......and so forth.