Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (15255)	9/9/2006 10:04:45 AM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Remote control flight technology is highly advanced. The locations of the impacts were chosen in advance. The "no planes" hypothesis can only exist, as a hypothesis, because the "official" fable is obviously a lie from start to finish. The combination that the "official" fable is a lie and there is a wide range of other possibilities leaves a large set of combinations of theoretical explanations. It can't be said that the "no-plane" hypothesis is impossible but people did hear the planes approach...and that doesn't quite jibe with "no-planes". Amateur videos show planes. It's difficult to imagine that ALL the amateur videos were made by "assets". Less than 1% of those demanding 9/11 truth consider the "no-plane" theory as probable. Proof that the "official" fable is a lie undeniably exists. It's all that's necessary to show who's guilty. Once even one piece of undeniable proof is shown, it's not up to anyone to explain every single detail. It's up to the guilty parties to pay. If they decide to explain every detail fine but even that's not necessary. Freefall of the buildings. Not enough energy available in the potential energy of the mass of the buildings at their known heights in a gravity-only collapse to produce the known results. As a separate crime, the EPA was ordered to say the air was safe to breathe afterward when the EPA tests showed it was absolutely unsafe. People are dying from that. That's murder. It's not necessary to prove exactly how they did it to prove that they did it. Get the undeniable proof in the mainstream and the pressure will force more information out. The way to do that is TELL EVERYONE the undeniable proofs.

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (15255)	9/9/2006 11:12:05 AM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

so the people in NY City who saw the planes hit the towers really didn't see them? oh ok.....twilight zone music.....

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (15255)	9/9/2006 6:59:48 PM
From: David Howe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

<<< Did you know that Popular Mechanics published the fall times for the two 1000 ft towers? >>> So it wasn't a plane that we see hitting the buildings? It was a hologram of some kind? Is that what you are saying? Was the impact explosion that blew right through the building also a hologram, or did a missile or something hit the building and the hologram just cover up the actual weapon? Where did all of the hijacked planes go if they didn't hit the buildings. Curious minds want to know just exactly what your theory is.