Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (49908)	9/9/2006 12:52:47 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50167

Similarly they have resolved that all foreigners in North Waziristan will leave Pakistan, albeit those who are unable to do so for certain genuine reasons shall respect law of the land and abide by all conditions of the agreement. If this is the case, then would that not suggest that they are implicitly stating that Bin Ladin is being "deported" out of Pakistan? Or at the very least, does this mean that the Taliban, who are predominantly Pashtun Afghanis (as I understand it) are being told "go home" and get out of Pakistan? WHICH, if this is the case, could explain the recent higher level of Taliban activity in Afghanistan. They are losing their refuge in Pakistan and now they have to fight their way into Afghanistan. And this would explain the sudden requestion by the NATO commander on the ground for more troops... What do you think.. Is that probable? Hawk