SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MrLucky who wrote (28422)9/9/2006 7:40:47 PM
From: Dale Baker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541052
 
If you are saying a politician doesn't need to be articulate enough to explain ideas that are compelling to the majority of voters, we would disagree. That's like saying that giving a high school senior a C- in English is "badmouthing", just because he can't write a coherent paragraph. Sounds dangerously like all that liberal mollycoddling that conservatives always complain about.

Whatever happened to standards and achievement? Are they coastie snobbery when representatives of a certain political class fall short, and important goals for our nation when applied to the broad masses?

Slippery slope you are on there. FWIW, one of the most famous orators ever in the White House was a Republican, Lincoln. I don't think it's "badmouthing" his successors to judge them by historical standards. Why should selected presidents suddenly become exempt?



To: MrLucky who wrote (28422)9/10/2006 2:45:34 AM
From: RMF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541052
 
I don't remember the "MSM" criticizing Bush Sr. for his speaking skills. The main criticism of Bush I, came from Rush Limbaugh and the right-wing. They didn't think he was tough enough and Reaganesque enough. When he actually dared to put the country ahead of his silly "read my lips" quote, they HATED him.

Don't lump Bush I, in with Bush (the moron) II. It does a major disservice to Bush I.