Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RMF who wrote (11800)	9/10/2006 11:28:33 AM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Clinton kept them pretty much at that level during his term, Pack of libber lies. Clinton and Madie Notsobright gladhanded NK and NK slapped them around going right ahead with thier nuke program.

To: RMF who wrote (11800)	9/10/2006 11:31:38 AM
From: PROLIFE	Respond to of 71588

September 7, 2006 - San Francisco, CA - PipeLineNews.org - The Clintonistas are coming....in a panic borne of the necessity - to dispel the truth regarding how the Clinton administration failed on numerous occasions to apprehend or kill bin-Laden - the Clintonistas and Democrat party hacks like Richard Ben-Veniste alike are rising en-masse in a last ditch attempt to censor ABC's upcoming 6 hour docudrama "The Path To 9/11." Clinton representatives drafted a four page letter to Disney Chair Michael Iger - ABC's parent company - demanding the film be censored or barring that its suppression. "The content of this drama is factually and incontrovertibly inaccurate and ABC has the duty to fully correct all errors or pull the drama entirely..." Ben Veniste attended an August screening of the film at the National Press Club and reportedly was so upset by the portrayal of Clinton as more intent on diddling Monica Lewinsky than dealing with bin-Laden that he got in the face of writer/producer Cyrus Nowrasteh and Gov. Thomas H. Kean [chair of the 9/11 Commission and a consultant on the project]. ABC - so far anyway - seems intent on sticking to its plan to air the now controversial film on Sunday and Monday evening, September 10th & 11th - the fifth anniversary of the attack. "The Path to 9/11 is a dramatization, not a documentary, drawn from a variety of sources, including the 9/11 commission report, other published materials and from personal interviews."The events that lead to 9/11 originally sparked great debate, so it's not surprising that a movie surrounding those events has revived the debate. "The attacks were a pivotal moment in our history that should never be forgotten and it's fitting that the discussion continues." - ABC Television, September 7, 2006 Whether the film makes it to television relatively intact remains to be seen at this point. Ominously ABC has said that it is still being edited just days ahead of its slated debut. The Clintonista's strong arm tactics with ABC speaks volumes regarding how fragile the Clinton legacy actually is with a singular event threatening to sink his carefully crafted legacy of deceit. The last word on this...for now anyway. If anyone doubts the inherent Stalinism of the nutroots kiddies whom Harry Reid and Rahm Emanuel bend over to accommodate, one only needs to contemplate their intent to block internet access to anything but their own twisted version of "The Path to 9/11" via what they are calling a Google-bomb. A Google-bomb - in theory only because it seems to us that the folks at Google should be able to program their algorithm's around such obvious fakery - consists of flooding the internet with thousand or even millions of cloned web pages to enforce the party line content on this whole sickening affair via manipulating key word functions and therefore their ranking order in search engines. If there is anything that pisses off the higher ups at Google it is intentionally attempting to manipulate how the internet's most used search engine works, and the little despots in training at the lefty blogs might very well get a very rude awakening if and when they attempt this stunt.

To: RMF who wrote (11800)	9/11/2006 10:14:18 AM
From: Geoff Altman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

I can tell from your last post that you have a terminal case of BDS and therefore there's little as far as logical debate that can be accomplished here (in other words, it's a waste of my time trying to talk sense into you).

To: RMF who wrote (11800)	9/11/2006 1:53:52 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

You choose to blame everyone but the man who armed North Korea for their being armed. It was Clinton who gave them the nuclear reactor and fed them to help them withstand a critical food shortage that might have toppled the dictatorship. So, by extension you claim it was anyone else but Clinton who bears responsibility for his actions. Oh, and you have mistyped President Bush's name. Regardless of how much you hate him, we all owe the respect to the office. Please do not do that again. Thanks for your cooperation.