Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ichy Smith who wrote (202389)	9/10/2006 12:15:32 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Respond to of 281500

What does the UN say about India and Pakistan, or China and Russia, or any combo of the 4, most of which are at least probable, and not currently in ?

To: Ichy Smith who wrote (202389)	9/10/2006 12:17:52 PM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

But the UN has brokered a peace with Lebanon and israel in which Lebanon had no intention of keeping even one of the articles agreed upon. The US and France wrote the resolution....didn't Bush say something about it not supporting the "status quo" and would result in "lasting peace"? If Iran has the nuclear weapons, and israel destroys Iran, I see a need to bind the UN so that it's definite proislamic stance doesn't make things worse. Iran and Israel have a nuclear exchange wiping both countries off the map and you're concerned about the alleged pro-Islamic stance of the UN making it worse? ROTFLOL. jttmab