Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy who wrote (202524)	9/11/2006 11:09:02 AM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I'm not looking for evidence. The evidence is already there. Also, it's very difficult to physically look for any additional evidence. It was removed from the scene before investigation and destroyed...illegally.

To: Elroy who wrote (202524)	9/11/2006 12:20:43 PM
From: geode00	Respond to of 281500

The early views were that Bin laden was shocked that the WTC went down as were, obviously, firefighters and other NY emergency crew. The 'we need a Pearl Harbor' Neocon/Fascist argument didn't require the WTC to go down, it only required an incident which they could play up with their huge propaganda network (radio, church pulpits, cable, newspapers, magazines, books and, now, ABC/Disney). This had nothing little or nothing to do with Afghanistan, it had only to do with Iraq. Small incident => Fascist propaganda machine => outsized fear by 50% or more of the American public => money for Fascists. It's a pretty efficient system and it has played over and over and over again although the efficiency has been reduced since most people eventually see the reality on the ground.