Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RMF who wrote (11871)	9/12/2006 6:46:40 PM
From: White Bear	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

>>Peter...we ARE safer in the respect that we are very cognizant of people trying to attack us. But we AREN'T safer when you consider how many MORE people WANT to attack us.<< There you go again. consider how many more people WANT to attack us. Tell us how you made the count, how much it was in each geographical location, who they are, and what the real total is. I would also like to know what number in the past, and what date you are comparing it with. To make it simple, just admit you are just running off at the mouth, and don't have any idea what you are talking about.

To: RMF who wrote (11871)	9/12/2006 10:19:22 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71588

We are safer because we have uncovered a higher count of people who have always wanted to destroy our way of life. We are safer because we have exposed our fair weather allies weakness in the WOT. 9/11 was the day that changed our lives; people who want to live as if it never happened are deluding themselves. Actually the world is safer because of actions put in place by President Bush. The Presidency of Clinton was the period of ignorance of how dangerous the world was becoming. So would you suggest that during the period of increasing obfuscation of the dangers we were actually getting safer? To those of use (read most of us) that were lulled into ignorance we might have been feeling safer even while becoming more exposed to the risk of terrorism.