Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (302904)	9/12/2006 1:22:19 PM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 1572158

"The "nuance" is noted, but my point stands." It isn't a nuance. Or even a small detail. F911 was shown in theaters and in small groups. The only ones who went to see it were ones with full knowledge of what it was. "Path to 9/11" is packaged as being actually factual, and there are even plans to distribute it to schools as a lesson in history. There is a huge difference here.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (302904)	9/12/2006 3:05:47 PM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572158

>The "nuance" is noted, but my point stands. It all depends on what your definition of a "documentary" is. It's not a f***ing nuance. Do you know what a nuance is? -Z

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (302904)	9/14/2006 12:55:25 AM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1572158

CJ, When was that on a major network during prime time, commercial free? The "nuance" is noted, but my point stands. It all depends on what your definition of a "documentary" is. Ten, it wasn't some minor interpretation of an ancient, historical event; they were bold face lying about recent history. A lie that came from the fertile mind of a conservative screenwriter. It would be the equivalent of the Germans coming up with a documentary that claimed Hitler was really a nice guy but fell in with the wrong crowd.