SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Contrarian Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bruwin who wrote (78)9/13/2006 3:48:03 PM
From: fedman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4080
 
One of the problems with the past 12 months for HSOA is much of its business is Hurricane Katrina related. The funding is just getting spent and so it's a bit event driven.

But you're evaluation criteria make sense and it remains to be seen if HSOA has all the business they claim. It's a toughie, no doubt.



To: bruwin who wrote (78)9/13/2006 4:17:30 PM
From: jsabelko  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4080
 
Bruwin, interesting as i do it a bit differently. For a stock I'm new to the first screen I do in my head is ev/ebitda using current QUARTER ebitda annualized. I want a number <9 to look further. If that hits I then look for seasonality, debt load, recent revenue and earnings growth, current forward earnings estimates. I try to keep it simple and ebidta/ev is my only "hard" criteria. I use most recent Q numbers as I generally look for small caps or turnaround stories and want to identify the situation early not several quarters into the process. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying what is "right" or "wrong" just interesting how each of us do our initial screen.

For HSOA, ebidta/ev is 8-9, seasonality is stronger 2nd half so that is in my favor as annualized 2Q, debt is minimal,recent growth in revenue and ebidta is very strong and forecast is strong. Based on this I'm now interested and started more thorough dd.

joby