Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (2347)	9/13/2006 6:08:14 PM
From: J.B.C.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50729

Open Mic, I see your point hmmmmm....... Now, of course, the FAA controller new exactly which plane and it's location by what the ARAB said????? You'll have to show me that transcript. Since all the hijacked flights turned off their transponders the FAA had no idea where they were. Ok genius, now you know a jet has been hijacked, which flight is it(positively ID'd)? And with with no transponder, where do you send the interceptors? What altitude? I , and many, eagerly await your response. You and I differ greatly on what constitutes a POSITIVELY ID'd plane that is actionable for an intercept. Now it's me ROTFLMFAO at your simple thoughts. Jim