Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RMF who wrote (11941)	9/13/2006 4:59:04 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

I could agree with the idea that we couldn't count on successfully shooting down the missiles, but that we DEFINITELY couldn't shoot them down goes to far.

To: RMF who wrote (11941)	9/13/2006 5:32:29 PM
From: White Bear	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

If it was pointless why did you comment on it?

To: RMF who wrote (11941)	9/13/2006 7:40:39 PM
From: White Bear	Respond to of 71588

I can tell by your first sentence, that you are correct. It was pointless to spell out the need for sources when you talk about defensive missile programs like you have a top security clearance. You can't qualify either. A security clearance investigation is an inquiry into an individual’s loyalty, character, trustworthiness and reliability to ensure that he or she is eligible for access to national security information.